Legal Opinion

Mullins, Inc. v. Benton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 1992No. 1848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, Judge:

This is an action for specific performance of an option contract. L.D. and Dorothy Benton own real property in Horry County. J.R. Mullins is the president of Mullins, Inc. On January 25, 1988, the Bentons and Mullins, acting on behalf of *87Mullins, Inc., executed a document designated as an “option” relating to the property of the Bentons. In its complaint, Mullins, Inc., alleges the Bentons failed to comply with the terms of the option and sought specific performance. The master entered an order granting specific performance. The Bentons have appealed. We affirm in part, reverse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. CordellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Lindler v. AdcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Stanley Smith & Sons v. D.M.R. Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Destec Energy, Inc. v. Southern California Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Irvin Temple & Associates, a South Carolina General Partnership v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API