Legal Opinion

Mills v. Post

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. Cent. L. J. 51-75 ; Brocchus v. Morgan, 5 Cent. L. J. 53; Goolc v. Tullís, 18 Wall. 332 ; Ex parte Hobbs, 14 Nat. Bank Reg. 495 : Greene v. Haskell, 5 R. I. 456.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

The petition alleges that plaintiff, at dates named, placed in the hands of defendant’s intestate two sums, amounting in the aggregate to $3,000, to be invested in behalf of plaintiff in contracts for organs,— decedent to account to plaintiff for the funds so invested, and to receive as compensation, as trustee and agent of plaintiff, one-half of the profits ; *520that for the principal and residue of the profits he was to account to plaintiff on demand. It was further agreed that the business was to be conducted and the accounts kept in the name of ‘ ‘ Joseph Mills, trustee in the event of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rieper v. RieperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Mills v. PostSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API