Families Achieving Independence & Respect v. Nebraska Department of Social Services
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentMagill, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. Because I conclude that the Nebraska Department of Social Services’ Lancaster County local office’s (NDSS) policy on expressive activities by outside groups is not unconstitutionally vague, and that the district court correctly determined that (1) the NDSS office is not a public forum; (2) the NDSS’s regulation of expressive conduct in the office is reasonable; and (3) the NDSS prohibition on Families Achieving Independence and Respect’s (FAIR) efforts to advocate their position to a captive audience was not motivated by opposition to their viewpoint, I would affirm…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.