McCook v. Caruthers
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division B. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.
T. J. Caruthers doing business as T. J. Caruthers Lumber Company, filed a bill in chancery against W. E. McCook, J. R. Taylor and Elizabeth K. Taylor to forclose a material man’s lien on “the East half of Lot ‘C’ of Binkley’s Addition to Fort Brooke,” Tampa, Florida.
Decree pro confesso was taken as to Defendant McCook and a demurrer to the bill on the part of J. R. and Eliza*239beth K. Taylor was overruled. J. R. and Elizabeth K. Táylor answered, a special master was appointed who took and made report to the court of all testimony offered and taken by him, and on final hearing a decree was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Waterman v. HigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Sandlin v. Hunter Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Jordan v. SayreSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
- Johns v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roland v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Stringfellow v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Escobedo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. Jensen Road & Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- White v. CrandallSupreme Court of Florida · 1931