Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Jones

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1935No. 3 Div. 766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Aside from any other questions presented, the grounds for a new trial filed in the circuit court present no legal reason entitling defendant to the relief prayed in said motion; so that even if the motion had been heard on its merits the result must have been the same.

The matters suggested in the motion may be such as to address themselves to the Board of Pardons, but do not present any legal reason for a new trial.

The writ is denied.

On Rehearing.

The petitioner was indicted, regularly tried, convicted of grand larceny, and sentenced to a term in the penitentiary. Within thirty days from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte UpchurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Bibb v. GastonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex parte BrannanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Davis v. HardwickAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API