Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Brennan

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1951No. 10412, 10413PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*667Fox, President:

These cases arise upon rules in prohibition awarded petitioners, William -T. Fahey and Martin F. Fahey, against the Honorable J. H. Brennan, Judge of the Circuit Court of Hancock County, to show cause why that judge should not be prohibited from further proceeding in matters relating to the suspension or annulment of petitioners’ licenses to practice law. Due to the identity of the issues involved in the two cases, they are consolidated for the purposes of this opinion.

Each petition recites that petitioner is a resident of the State, is a licensed attorney at law, with law…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Vineyard v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In re Application for License to Practice LawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Sidney C. Smith Corp. v. DaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fisher v. BouchelleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. In Re EaryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stern Bros., Inc. v. McClureWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Committee On Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. PietrantonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State ex rel. Barden & Robeson Corp. v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Health Management, Inc. v. LindellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. STATE EX REL. BARDEN AND ROBESON v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API