Legal Opinion

Sweetzer v. Mead

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The question of the propriety of the amendment made by the Circuit Judge to Ms finding of facts, can not be passed upon here. It has been frequently held that a judge may, after the lapse of one or many terms, amend the *34verdict upon the judge’s notes or other proof of the evidence given on the trial, sp as to apply such verdict to the proper counts, for the furtherance of justice. So amendments to bills of exceptions have been made after the lapse of a long time, and judges have been compelled by mandamus to make them where it was shown that they were in accordance with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matheson's Admin. v. Grant's Admin.Supreme Court of the United States · 1844

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lang v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. O'Flynn v. EagleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Hill v. RobbinsCircuit Court of the 6th Circuit of Michigan · 1870
  5. Sprague v. DevensCircuit Court of the 15th Circuit of Michigan · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API