Hoskins v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
MILLIKEN, Justice.
Appellees instituted -this action under Section 639a-l of the Civil Code of Practice, seeking a declaration of rights under a certain r.eal estate sales contract. The chancellor adjudged that, the appellant was legally bound to perform the contract. The controlling issue is whether a provision in a deed of 1889' authorizing ■ forfeiture for breach of a covenant restricting the sale of alcoholic bevearges so affects the marketability of the^ title as to justify-an intended purchaser’s .refusal to -take, the property.
The facts are undisputed. The appellees, Orin Walker, Ruth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Vliet & Place, Inc. v. GainesNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Smith v. City of KuttawaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Mercer-Lincoln Pine Knob Oil Co. v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Williams v. Johnson, GovernorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Furlow v. SturgeonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Camenisch v. City of StanfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Your Community Bank, Inc. v. Woodlawn Springs Homeowners Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966