Legal Opinion

Miller v. Emerson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1947No. 8750PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff brought this action under section 11174, Revised Codes, to recover money lost by her husband in alleged gambling games operated and conducted by defendant. The jury awarded a verdict in her favor in the sum of $2,940, being the exact amount demanded by her in her complaint. Judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendant’s motion for new trial was denied and he appealed from the judgment.

The first point urged by defendant is that his motion for new trial should have been granted because the jury’s' verdict is contrary to the instructions and the result of passion and prejudice…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Matter of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Reed v. Woodmen of the WorldMontana Supreme Court · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. Sherburne Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bohrer v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. A. T. Klemens & Son v. Reber Plumbing & Heating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Zook Bros. Construction Company v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. WimberlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API