Legal Opinion

Bank of Montreal v. J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (G-artner, J.) Petition for allowance of claim against the estate of an insolvent corporation under Act No. 94, Laws of 1887. The receivers appeal from an order allowing the claim. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The petitioner shows that he had a contract with the J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Company for putting in logs at a stated price per 1,000 feet, and for grading a railroad bed at a fixed price per yard, and in some instances at a fixed price per mile. He presents a petition asking to have the balance remaining unpaid declared entitled to a preference as a labor debt, under Act No. 94, Laws of 1887 (3 How. Stat. § 8749m). The petitioner employed in this work from 30 to 40 men, 5 or 6 teams owned by himself, and other teams hired *352for the work. A portion of the contract price was paid from time to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Assignment of George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Shaw v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindale Brick Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. In re JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1907
  3. Michigan Trust Co. v. Grand Rapids DemocratMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Jorgensen v. MickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API