Legal Opinion

Wammco, Inc. v. Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 1996No. Record 950752PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

*134In this appeal from a judgment in a highway condemnation proceeding, we decide whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of adjustment costs as an element of damage to the residue of the property.

I. Proceedings

The Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner (the Commissioner) made a bona fide, but ineffectual, effort to purchase a 17.65-acre tract of land in the City of Chesapeake for construction of a portion of Interstate Highway 664 (1-664). This tract was a part of a larger tract containing 314 acres.

In 1989, the Commissioner recorded a certificate of take pursuant to Code §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. GormanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. State Highway & Transportation Commissioner v. Lanier Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Richmond & Petersburg Electric Railway Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. Lynch v. Commonwealth Transportation CommissionerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Dressler v. City of CovingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Virginia Beach v. OakesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. Revocor Corp. v. Commonwealth Transportation CommissionerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Commissioner of Highways v. Karverly, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  4. Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner v. American Service CenterArlington County Circuit Court · 1997
  5. Helmick Family Farm v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API