Legal Opinion
(PS) Iegorova v. Pavel
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01109Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, No. 2:19-cv-01109-JAM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 PALYGA PAVEL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 11, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, 18 dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, and provided plaintiff with 30 days to file a 19 first amended complaint. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to timely comply with 20 the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.