Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dowd v. Harmon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1951No. 28,606Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Gilkison, J.

I concur in the opinion in so far as it holds that either party to the action is entitled to a change of judge upon proper application therefor, timely filed and presented. A denial of this right to appellant by the trial court constitutes reversible error, which may properly be presented on appeal.

I also concur in the opinion that the proper authorities may transfer an epileptic patient from the Indiana Village for Epileptics to another benevolent institution should occasion require but I rather violently disagree with the opinion that such a patient may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Helms v. American Security Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In re LeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Willis v. BaylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Huff v. FetchIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API