Dowd v. Harmon
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Gilkison, J.
I concur in the opinion in so far as it holds that either party to the action is entitled to a change of judge upon proper application therefor, timely filed and presented. A denial of this right to appellant by the trial court constitutes reversible error, which may properly be presented on appeal.
I also concur in the opinion that the proper authorities may transfer an epileptic patient from the Indiana Village for Epileptics to another benevolent institution should occasion require but I rather violently disagree with the opinion that such a patient may be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Helms v. American Security Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- In re LeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Willis v. BaylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Huff v. FetchIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.