Prentice v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Georgia
Partners. Statute of Limitations. Interest and Usury. Before Judge Brown. Floyd Superior Court. March Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the CourtBlandeord, Justice
Elliott and Prentice entered into partnership in September,! 87 1, for the purpose of buying and selling cotton, under the namo of J. M. Elliott, which continued until September, 1872, Avhen the same Avas dissolved by Prentice withdraAVingfrom the firm. Daring the existence of the partnership, Prentice made advances to the firm, and also Elliott; they had dealings Avith a firm in New York; and in 1870, Avithin four years from the dissolution, the New York firm, Inman, Swann & Co., assigned their claim, which was an account, to John Inman, one of the firm of Inman, Swann & Co., who commenced…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Paulk v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Smith v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Purvis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.