Legal Opinion

People v. Leighton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1981No. Crim. 13107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, J.

After an unsuccessful motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), defendant Karen Leighton pleaded guilty to grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1). She was granted probation upon conditions inter alia that she spend nine months in the county jail. She appeals, contending the warrantless search of her bedroom was illegal and her motion to suppress evidence improperly denied.

Facts

Leighton worked as an employee of the customer service department of Nordstrom Department Store (Nordstrom) in the South Coast Plaza of the City of Costa Mesa. Between November 1, 1979,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. ZelinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dyas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. NorthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. People v. De JuanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. State of Arizona v. Max Valencia ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API