Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided August 23, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Randy Laverty State Representative P.O. Box 303 Jasper, Arkansas 72641

Dear Representative Laverty:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on two follow-up questions arising in light of the conclusions reached in Op. Att'y Gen.94-400, which concluded generally that National Park Service regulations, to the extent of any conflict, would take precedence over state or county law with regard to the regulation of traffic on county roads within the "Buffalo National River." Opinion No. 94-400 cited applicable precedent concluding that the fact that the county owns the roads…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Bedford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  2. Dickerson v. Tri-County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Carpenter v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1992
  4. United States v. Certain Lands Located in the Raritan & WoodbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API