Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Marriage of Marshall

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1986No. 85-1580Published

1DissentLarson, Justice

I agree with Division I of the majority opinion; the district court had jurisdiction to act on the application for modification. I do not agree, however, that a court has authority to modify a provision for fixed-term alimony.

The majority finds authority to modify the award in Iowa Code section 598.21(8) (1985) which provides, in relevant part, that “[t]he court may subsequently modify orders made under this section when there is a substantial change in circumstances.” I submit this is not a grant of new authority at all; for well over 100 years our Code has provided for modification under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Knipfer v. KnipferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Duvall v. DuvallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Dwight v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. In Re the Marriage of JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API