In re the Marriage of Marshall
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentLarson, Justice
I agree with Division I of the majority opinion; the district court had jurisdiction to act on the application for modification. I do not agree, however, that a court has authority to modify a provision for fixed-term alimony.
The majority finds authority to modify the award in Iowa Code section 598.21(8) (1985) which provides, in relevant part, that “[t]he court may subsequently modify orders made under this section when there is a substantial change in circumstances.” I submit this is not a grant of new authority at all; for well over 100 years our Code has provided for modification under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Knipfer v. KnipferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Duvall v. DuvallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Dwight v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.