Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nevada Power Co. v. Haggerty

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1999No. 31335Published

1DissentAgosti, J., joined by Leavitt, J., agrees

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the district court’s order and remand the matter for trial.

Initially, I note that the majority has determined that Raymond Haggerty’s injuries were not caused by contact with an overhead line within the meaning of NRS 455.200(2). It should stop there. Its conclusion that the overhead power line statutes create an independent duty to indemnify need not and should not be reached if the circumstances of this case do not bring it within the parameters of the overhead power line statutes. As stated in City of North Las Vegas v. Cluff, 85 Nev. 200, 201, 452…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carson Ready Mix, Inc. v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Colello v. Administrator of the Real Estate DivisionNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Diamond Enterprises, Inc. v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of North Las Vegas v. CluffNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Alderson v. GilmoreNevada Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API