Legal Opinion

Adoue v. Strahan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas

Decided November 14, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, District Judge.

This bill' was filed by the plaintiffs, who owned the property in controversy, against Kent Strahan, who was the purchaser at a tax sale, and Ike Bell, his tenant, to cancel a tax deed, regular oh its face, which constitutes a cloud upon the title to the property, and for rents and profits. The bill shows on its face that the defendants are in possession of the property.

On the very threshold we are met with the proposition of law as to whether or not a party out of possession of real estate, and holding the legal title, can maintain a bill in a United States circuit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Whitehead v. ShattuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Cates v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Corson Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. Union Pac. R. v. CunninghamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1909
  3. Hanley v. Kansas & T. Coal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1901
  4. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. QuigleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API