Legal Opinion

Pape v. Randall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1897No. 1,986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

An action was brought in the Allen Circuit Court by one William E. Mossman, as payee, against the appellant and appellee as makers, upon a promissory note. These defendants separately answered the complaint of Mossman by general denials, and filed cross-complaints against each other, each therein claiming to be the surety for the other upon said note.

A trial resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff Mossman against both the defendants, for $1,545.16; and the cause was continued as to the question of suretyship between the appellant and the appellee.

*54The venue having been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Starr v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Moorman v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. De Pauw v. Bank of SalemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Pool v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. AlbertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Karas v. SkourasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Sansberry v. CorneliusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Pleasant School Township v. FultzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Town of CarlisleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API