Legal Opinion

American Spring & Wire Specialty Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 31, 1961No. Docket No. 72374UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petitioner, in purchasing realty to expand its facilities, paid $10,000 to the lessee thereof for the cancellation of the lease so that petitioner could obtain immediate possession. Held, that this payment is a capital expenditure and hence neither deductible, nor amortizable over the remaining life of the lease.

1Opinion of the Court

American Spring & Wire Specialty Co. v. Commissioner.

American Spring & Wire Specialty Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 72374.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1961-26; 1961 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 322; 20 T.C.M. (CCH) 116; T.C.M. (RIA) 61026;

January 31, 1961

Petitioner, in purchasing realty to expand its facilities, paid $10,000 to the lessee thereof for the cancellation of the lease so that petitioner could obtain immediate possession. Held, that this payment is a capital expenditure and hence neither deductible, nor amortizable over the remaining life of the lease.

Rayford W. Lemley, Esq., for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Helvering v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. Thalhimer Bros., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  5. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southland Royalty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Southland Royalty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API