Legal Opinion

In re Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an accounting proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Bloom, S., on decision; Pizzuto, S., on order), entered June 1, 1989, which denied the appellants’ motion to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellants personally.

SCPA 2110 (1) provides: "At any time during the administration of an estate and irrespective of the pendency of a particular proceeding, the court is authorized to fix and determine the compensation of an attorney for services rendered to a fiduciary or to a devisee, legatee, distributee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WarholAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Estate of KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API