Clark v. Commonwealth

CLAY, Commissioner.

The appeals in these two cases have been consolidated. Appellant was convicted of two separate offenses of selling and possessing alcoholic beverages in local option territory.

With respect to the offense of selling, she contends the indictment was defective because it did not name the purchaser of the liquor. Without deciding whether the indictment was sufficient under RCr 6.10(2) and RCr 6.12, the question presented was waived because the objection was not raised by motion before trial, which RCr 8.18 requires.

It is next contended it was not shown that Metcalfe County was…