Legal Opinion

Bolles v. Heckman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 12, 1909Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Lillie H. Bolles against Charles Heckman. From an order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

While the court below seems to have been warranted in setting aside the verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the ground that the amount of the damages clearly indicated a compromise and was unsupported by the evidence, still, inasmuch as the jury found upon sufficient testimony in favor of the plaintiff on the main issues in suit, and erred, through no fault of plaintiff, only in the amount allowed for damages, terms should have been imposed as a condition for setting aside the verdict. Murphy v. Interurban St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 88 N. Y. Supp. 187.

It seems to us that the order should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API