Jewell v. Albrecht
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
At a former day of this term, we overruled appellees’ motion to affirm on certificate, and also their motion to dismiss the writ of error. We have concluded that we were in error in not granting the motion to affirm on certificate.
H. Yeal Jewell sued Fred W. Albrecht, T. G. Churchill, and R. C. Veihl, alleged to be residents of Tarrant county, and John Le Page, alleged to be a resident of Dallas county. He alleged he had a contract in writing with the defendant Churchill to purchase a certain lot in Boaz addition to the city of Fort Worth, and that by the terms of the contract, Churchill…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wandry v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. ClanceyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Perez v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Welch v. WeissTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Thompson v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jarrell v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bond BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Woodfin v. HulenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Young's Bus Lines v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Jarrell v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bond Bank of PothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933