Legal Opinion
Sklarsky v. Wayne Lawrence Construction Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William R. Brexxam, Jr., J.
The defendant Wayne Lawrence Construction Corp. (“Wayne”) moves to dismiss two causes of action in the second amended complaint. The motion is granted.
By agreement dated August 7,1958, the plaintiff husband and Wayne contracted for the purchase and sale of real property at Lawrence described as Job No. 10 in a specified block and lot. The building was apparently complete and clauses in the contract relating to inability of Wayne to complete the building were stricken.
This instrument provided for delivery at closing on October 10, 1958 of a certificate of occupancy,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Price v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Meyer v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Meyer v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Mohawk Overall Co. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Proteus Books Limited, Cross-Appellee v. Cherry Lane Music Company, Incorporated, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Staff v. Lido Dunes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Novelty Crystal Corp. v. PSA Institutional Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hi Tor Industrial Park, Inc. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Copland v. NathanielNew York Supreme Court · 1995