Fuller v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Rehearing of case reported in 98 Neb. 727.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
Rehearing of case reported in 98 Neb. 727. In the former opinion it was held that the plaintiff could not recover for any injuries occurring to his horses on the line of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, for the reason that a judgment had been rendered in the action in favor of the Union Pacific Railroad Company and against him on the issues. In the motion for rehearing, and on the argument, our attention was called more particularly to the principle that an initial carrier is liable for all damages occurring due to a defective car furnished by it, although the injuries may have occurred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Allen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railroad v. DeaverNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. LanganNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Fuller v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wegner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1922