Legal Opinion

Cottingham v. Cottingham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1923No. 3395PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. The demurrer to the 5th paragraph of the petition was not a general demurrer, as contended in the brief of the attorneys for the plaintiff in error, but was a special demurrer eliciting further information with reference to the matters therein stated. The allegations were demurrable on the grounds taken, and the judge did not err in sustaining the demurrer to that paragraph of the petition.

2. The demurrer to the 6th paragraph of the petition was also a special demurrer, and the judge did not err in sustaining so much of it as complained that there was no allegation as to the time when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Union Investment Co. v. EngesserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. CrenshawMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rodgers v. First Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Perry v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Smith v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API