State v. Benoit
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J.:
This case comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See State v. Benoit, No. 84,251, unpublished opinion filed June 28, 2002.
We affirm.
We had held that Benoit’s upward dispositional departure sentence must be reversed pursuant to State v. Gould, 271 Kan. 394, 23 P.3d 801 (2001). Our decision proved to be incorrect when the Supreme Court decided State v. Carr, 274 Kan. 442, 53 P.3d 843 (2002).
In its remand order, the Supreme Court ordered us to reconsider our holding in light of Carr and to consider the remaining issues not addressed in our prior opinion. On reconsideration…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. DubishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008