Legal Opinion

Harbour v. Pontiac

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1993No. 45A04-9211-CV-397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-plaintiff, J.C. Harbour (“Har-bour”), appeals the trial court’s judgment for the appellee-defendant, Bob Anderson Pontiac (“Bob Anderson”). We affirm.

Issues

Harbour presents four1 issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

I. whether the trial court properly denied Harbour’s motion to strike Bob Anderson’s objections to Harbour’s Statement of the Evidence, when the objections were filed more that ten days after Bob Anderson had received service of the statement of the evidence; and

II. whether the judgment is contrary to law.

Facts and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. DabisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Silverthorne v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Herrera v. Collection Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Reasor v. PUTNAM COUNTY, IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Equity Trust Company v. James P. Knepp and Andrea K. Slagh d/b/a Hahn, Walz & Knepp (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Paula Tackett v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Willie Erving Taylor, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API