Hammond v. Mulligan
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury case.
This case began when appellants sued ap-pellees for the negligence of appellee, Sharon Mulligan, arising from her operation of a vehicle owned by appellee, John Mulligan, resulting in a head-on collision in which appellant, Valerie Hammond, sustained injuries. Appellant, Russell Hammond, also sued appellees for loss of consortium. In their answer to appellants’ complaint, appel-lees denied any negligence on their part raising as an affirmative defense the comparative negligence of appellant, Valerie Hammond. Appellee,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Peterka v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Loper v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Minnis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carnival Corp. v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013