Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Mulligan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 1996No. 94-1688PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury case.

This case began when appellants sued ap-pellees for the negligence of appellee, Sharon Mulligan, arising from her operation of a vehicle owned by appellee, John Mulligan, resulting in a head-on collision in which appellant, Valerie Hammond, sustained injuries. Appellant, Russell Hammond, also sued appellees for loss of consortium. In their answer to appellants’ complaint, appel-lees denied any negligence on their part raising as an affirmative defense the comparative negligence of appellant, Valerie Hammond. Appellee,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Peterka v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. Loper v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Minnis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carnival Corp. v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API