Legal Opinion

Halm v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1972No. 46902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of escape. An appeal was filed and the case is here for review. Held:

1. The first enumeration of error contends that the State placed the defendant’s character in issue when the district attorney asked the warden of the prison camp if he would recommend the defendant as a "trusty.” The defense attorney had previously examined the same witness about the same subject matter and therefore the admission of the evidence was not error. Code Ann. § 38-1713 (Ga. L. 1971, p. 460) is not applicable since here the complaining party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spurlin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Fletcher v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Izzo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API