State v. Grunig
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
This appeal presents a discrete question of law — whether the state waived issues of a caretaker’s actual or apparent authority to consent to a search assuming the state did not argue these issues to the district court and the issues were raised for the first time on appeal. The court of appeals held that the state waived them. We reverse.
Relatively few facts are necessary to analyze the issues presented in this case. Respondent, Brad Grunig, lived with Amy Herzog and her daughter in an dpartment in New Ulm, Minnesota. They rented a garage that was not attached to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thigpen v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- People v. EngelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.