Legal Opinion

Freiman v. Freiman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony L. Parga, J.

Motion by the plaintiff husband for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), dismissing defendant wife’s four counterclaims on the ground that they are barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 213), is granted as to the first three counterclaims which seek to set aside the parties’ antenuptial agreement based upon duress, fraud and mutual mistake, and is denied, as a matter of first impression, with respect to defendant’s fourth counterclaim based upon the unconscionability clause applicable to antenuptial agreements contained in Domestic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Matisoff v. DobiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Avitzur v. AvitzurNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Bloomfield v. BloomfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API