Albrecht v. Cudihee
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered October 17, 1903, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of replevin, after a trial before the court without a jury, upon stipulated facts.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
The controversy here hinges upon the construction of the so-called “sales in bulk statute,” as found in chapter 109, session laws of 1901, p. 222. Prior to April 17, 1902, Harkins & Webb, copartners, were the owners of a saloon in Seattle, and were engaged in selling liquors and cigars at retail. On said day they sold their saloon to respondents, together with the entire stock of liquors and cigars; also, all barroom fixtures, chairs, tables, tools, and utensils, including a cash register. Respondents immediately took possession of said property, and engaged in the saloon business at the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kent v. Liverpool & London InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Van Patten v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Curtis v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gallus v. ElmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Swift Co. v. . TempelosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Everett Produce Co. v. Smith Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Smith v. BoyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Johnson v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.