Shankle v. Shankle

MORRIS, Judge.

In his first assignment of error defendant .contends that the trial court erréd in excluding certain questions asked of the plaintiff and Jill Shankle, the parties’ 19-year-old daughter/ eon.- cerning plaintiff’s reputation as the wife of Rolland Cole. Plaintiff, on the other hand, argues that this evidence was properly-excluded because: (1) it violated hearsay, opinion and firsthand knowledge rules, (2) the questions dealt with “specific acts” or a “general course of conduct” rather than “general reputation” and (3) the questions addressed to Jill Shankle did not refer to the…