New Heights Recovery & Power, LLC v. Bower
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cahill
The issue in this case is whether plaintiffs have a constitutionally-protected interest in the continuation of a specific rate of reimbursement for electricity generated and sold to a public utility company. The trial court concluded that such rights existed and prohibited application of a legislative enactment abolishing that rate. Because we conclude that a specific rate of reimbursement once mandated by the legislature does not create a constitutionally protected interest in the continuation of that rate, we reverse.
Plaintiffs, New Heights Recovery & Power, LLC, CGE Fulton, LLC, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caulkins v. PritzkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2023
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- McGinley v. MadiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Resource Technology Corp. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Chiplease, Inc. v. Illinois (In Re Resource Technology Corp.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.