Legal Opinion

Pearson & Co. v. Duckham

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 9, 1823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

A writ of error on a judgment of the Franklin circuit court. statement of the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court.

THIS was an action brought by' Pearson and Co. against Duckbam, for money laid out and expended by then\ to bis use. Non assumpsit was pleaded, and on the tijal it appeared from the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs, that they, as co-partners, and the defendant and another, were joint endorsers of a note executed to them by one Hume, for $2,346, negotiable and payable at the F rank fort Bank; that the bank discounted the note for the benefit of Hume; and the note not being paid when it became due, was protested for non; payment, on the third day of grace, and notice…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vansant's v. Gardner'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Morrison v. PoyntzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
  3. Kelley v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Hall v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Atkinson v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API