Legal Opinion

Godkin v. Corliss

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1906No. Docket No. 58Published

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by John Godkin against Edward E. Corliss, city treasurer of Bay City, for taxes paid under protest. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant, city treasurer of Bay City, to recover the amount of a personal tax assessed against his personal property in Doyle township in the county of Schoolcraft, which amount was paid by plaintiff, under written pro*508test, to release his personal property in Bay City from a levy made by defendant under the authority of a statement made to him by the treasurer of Doyle township, pursuant to section 3871, 1 Comp. Laws. The declaration was on the common counts in assumpsit. The statement of the township treasurer duly signed, certified, and acknowledged .as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LeRoy v. East Saginaw City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. McCoy v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Mogg v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of Muskegon v. S. K. Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API