Legal Opinion

Doak v. Angle & Angle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1939No. 29021PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, hereafter referred to as defendants, to recover damages for an alleged breach of an agreement to purchase an interest in real estate.

The agreement upon which the plaintiff predicated his right to recovery was in words and figures as follows:

“Duncan, Oklahoma
“Dec. 7, 1935.
“Mr. Nail Doak,
“Duncan, Okla.
“Dear Mr. Doak:
“According to our conversation, I am writing you this letter. I agree to buy (400) acres of leases from you described as follows:
“Northeast Quarter and 60 acres…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Commercial Oil Co. v. Indian Territory Ill. Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API