Legal Opinion

Wimmer Temporaries, Inc. v. Massoff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2000No. 93A02-0003-EX-161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants Defendants, Wimmer Temporaries, Inc. (Wimmer) and Amecast Industrial Corp. (Ameast) (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Defendants"), appeal the Award of the Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana (Board), finding in favor of Plaintiff Appellee, Martin David Massoff (Massoff), who was a temporary employee of Ameast supplied by Wimmer.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Defendants raise the sole issue on appeal of whether the Board erred by concluding that Amecast acquiesced in Mas-soff's violation of a conspicuously posted safety rule.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corp. v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rogers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Motor Freight Corporation v. JarvisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Kuhner Packing Co. v. HitchensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Neidige v. Cracker BarrelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graycor Industrial v. MetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Niegos v. ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Harsco Corporation v. Francisco Orta (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API