Legal Opinion

Standard Dredging Corporation v. S/S SYRA

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 2, 1968No. Adm. 4460PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

The original libel in this case was filed by Standard Dredging Corporation, owner of the Dredge Cartagena, against the S/S Syra to recover for damages to the pipeline of the dredge when it was struck by the Syra. The claimant of the Syra impleaded the United States, alleging that the collision was caused or contributed to by negligence of the United States in repositioning a floating buoy. The United States impleaded the Syra’s pilot and libelant, and the Syra’s claimant impleaded the pilot.

Facts

Some of the facts are stipulated. The other facts stated below have been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Atlee v. Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Anthony v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. The VictorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bunge Corp. v. M/V Furness BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Beeson v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Afran Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Claim of Gypsum Carrier v. Union Camp Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1979
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. Bonanza Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API