City of Tukwila v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Seattle and Tukwila, as old friends are wont to do, had a falling out. Tukwila enacted two ordinances reducing 85 to 90 per cent the franchised area served by Seattle City Light, thereby leaving Seattle City Light with 10 to 15 per cent of the area and Puget Sound Power & Light Company with 85 to 90 per cent. Seattle claims this to be a unilateral, unconstitutional impairment of its franchise and appeals the decision of the superior court upholding the ordinances. We would have an easier time of it were the record not so replete with nostalgic but diverting references to the growth and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. BoutelleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Ketcham v. King County Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.