Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Labatut
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 2, 1906No. 15,662Published
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George Henry Théard, Judge. Action by Jennie Nolan against Henry P. Labatut and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
MONROE, J.
The cause of action in this case is set forth, substantially, as follows:
That the defendant Labatut is a notary public, and that the defendant the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland is the surety on his official bond:
“That, at various and sundry times, * * * petitioner employed the said Labatut, as a notary, to procure the execution of acts of mortgage on real estate and notes secured thereby which petitioner desired to purchase as a means of investing her money; that said Labatut would inform petitioner when persons would come to him desiring to obtain loans on the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weintz v. KramerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
- State ex rel. Mathews v. BoughtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Succession of O'Keefe v. DelacroixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
- Stork v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Breen v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.