Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-2164PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent’s misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. GroteOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. GroteOhio Supreme Court · 1991