Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-2164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent’s misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. GroteOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. GroteOhio Supreme Court · 1991