Legal Opinion
State v. Hogg
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge. The defendant, William Hogg, was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of rape, and from the judgment and sentence imposed, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
1. Among others, the court gave to the jury the following charge:
“I instruct you, gentlemen of the jury, that if you believe from the evidence at the time of the alleged rape other people were at the same time in the immediate vicinity, who might easily have heard her had she made any outcry, and that she in fact made no outcry at the time the defendant was attempting to have connection with her, these facts will tend to raise a presumption that no rape was committed upon her at the time, unless she has satisfactorily explained why she did not make an outcry or call for help at the time.”
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alberty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. FairlambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. DesmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Anderson v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Oregon v. RisenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Gullatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- State v. WhitneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.