Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Girolo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1893No. Appeal, No. 56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 56, Jan. T., 1893, by plaintiff, E. P. Sweeney and G. W. Hoover, trading as the Curwensville Stone Co., from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., Sept. T., 1890, No. 299, on verdict for defendant, Andrew Girolo. Replevin for goods bought under an alleged invalid constable’s sale. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 56, Jan. T., 1893, by plaintiff, E. P. Sweeney and G. W. Hoover, trading as the Curwensville Stone Co., from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., Sept. T., 1890, No. 299, on verdict for defendant, Andrew Girolo. Replevin for goods bought under an alleged invalid constable’s sale. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Plaintiffs’ points were among others as follows : “ 1. The judgments vs. E. P. Sweeney upon which the executions were issued and under which the constable made the sale of the property, being void for want of jurisdiction, there was no authority to make…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Thompson,

' The appellants were dealing in stone taken from their quarry. Instead of quarrying the stone themselves, they entered -into an agreement with Michael Saturday, under which he was to operate it, dress and load the stone upon the cars for so much per cubic foot, and hire and pay for the labor. On June 21, 1890, summonses were issued in three actions by a justice of the peace against E. P. Sweeney, one of the appellants, and by default judgment was entered, executions were issued upon them and the property in question was sold to the appellee.. Thereupon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. SimcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Tarbox v. HaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  3. Winrow v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  4. Baird v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  5. Schollenberger v. NehfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hickey v. ConleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Field Enterprises Educational Corp. v. GolattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Haines v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Podol v. ShevlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Benninghoff v. StephensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API