Legal Opinion
Mitel, Inc. v. Iqtel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1997No. 95-1394PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mitel, Inc. (“Mitel”) appeals the denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction in this action for copyright infringement. 17 U.S.C. § 502(a). At issue is the protecta-bility of a set of four-digit numeric instructions known as “command codes.” Mitel created these command codes to access the features of a piece of telecommunications hardware known as a call controller.
Mitel contends that the district court erred in denying its motion for a preliminary injunction based upon the court’s conclusion that Mitel failed to demonstrate a substantial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Thomas Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc., David Susskind, Gill Champion, Martin Richards and Heywood GouldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- The Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Ferdinand Pickett, Cross-Appellee v. PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Paycom Payroll, LLC v. RichisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.