Legal Opinion
AdvnNewhse Comm v. FCC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 18, 2006No. 05-1237Published
1Opinion of the Court
460 F.3d 31
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and Advance/Newhouse Communications, Petitioners
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents
Consumer Electronics Association and National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Intervenors.
No. 05-1237.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 11, 2006.
Decided August 18, 2006.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission
John D. Seiver argued the cause for petitioners and intervenor National Cable and Telecommunications Association.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation v. United States Department of the Interior, American Iron and Steel Institute, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Council, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.