Legal Opinion

People v. Straub

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.

While defendant first challenges the voluntariness of his plea on the ground that he was not given adequate time to evaluate the offer, his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction renders this argument unpreserved for review (see People v Zimmerman, 87 AD3d 1225, 1225-1226 [2011]; People v Planty, 85 AD3d 1317, 1318 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 820 [2011]). To the extent that defendant argues that the exception to the preservation rule applies inasmuch as he made statements during the plea colloquy that suggested that his medications may have influenced his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. PlantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. MejiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. KilgoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API